Cryptographic Review
Authentication Protocol
Building zero-knowledge proof infrastructure to make review fraud mathematically impossible. Currently in development with working prototypes.
Development Status
๐ Cryptography
Working
Groth16 ZK-SNARK system with 1,155 R1CS constraints. BN128 curve, โฅ128-bit soundness.
๐ค Consensus
PBFT
Byzantine fault-tolerant consensus implemented and tested. TLA+ model-checked with 0 violations.
๐งช Testing
847 Tests
Comprehensive test suite with 100% passing rate
๐ก๏ธ Verification
5 Pillars
Internal verification bundle complete. TLA+ specs, Monte Carlo, threat model, and ZK circuit audit โ all locked.
~1.5s
Proof Generation
~200ms
Verification Time
4 Nodes
Test Network
742 bytes
Proof Size
Verification Evidence
Every claim below traces to a locked, hashed artifact in our verification repository. Internal verification follows Rigorous Digital Engineering methodology.
Consensus TLA+
EV-008 โ BFT safety proof with phase separation. 152M states explored, 0 invariant violations.
Token Lifecycle TLA+
EV-009 โ 7 invariants model-checked across 269 states. AtMostOneTokenPerPurchase, NullifierUniqueness, and 5 more โ 0 violations.
Mechanism Validation
MC-500 โ 500 Monte Carlo simulations. 100% honesty dominance. Minimum safety margin: 652ร. Analytic dominance proof: ฮฑยทCโยทN^ฮณ > k.
Threat Model
EV-010 โ 14 attack scenarios across 6 adversary classes. 6 formal security properties with threat-to-artifact traceability.
ZK Circuit Audit
EV-011 โ Line-by-line constraint audit of token circuit. 8 findings identified, 5 patched. 8/8 negative test vectors rejected at witness generation.
5/5
Pillars Locked
1,155
R1CS Constraints
0
TLA+ Violations
100%
Honesty Dominance
8/8
Vectors Rejected
Technical Foundation
Zero-Knowledge Proofs
- Circom circuits implemented and audited
- Groth16 on BN128 with trusted setup
- Python SDK operational
- FastAPI REST endpoints
Consensus Protocol
- PBFT with Ed25519 signatures
- Rotating committee design
- f < n/3 Byzantine tolerance
- TLA+ model-checked safety proof
Security Model
- Dolev-Yao network adversary
- Minority validator compromise
- Cryptographic soundness proofs
- Internal verification complete; external audit scoped
- Not yet production-audited โ independent review planned
Development Roadmap
โ Phase 1: Cryptographic Foundation
Zero-knowledge proof system implemented and tested
โ Phase 2: Consensus Protocol
PBFT consensus with Byzantine fault tolerance
โ Phase 3: Internal Verification
5-pillar verification bundle complete โ TLA+ models, Monte Carlo, threat model, ZK circuit audit. All locked with execution evidence.
โ Phase 4: External Audit & Network Expansion
Independent protocol attestation (Trail of Bits / Veridise). Scale validator network and optimize performance.
Phase 5: Production Deployment
Enterprise pilots and compliance certification
Technical Collaboration
Phase 1 internal verification is complete. We are engaging external auditors for independent protocol attestation and welcome academic collaboration on advanced formal properties.
TLA+ Modeling โ
SAW/Cryptol
Game Theory โ
Information Flow